Multi-Party Multi-Objective Optimization as Consensus Search: Runtime Analysis of Cross-Party Recombination
Xiaolei Fang, Peilan Xu, Wenjian Luo

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the runtime of cross-party recombination in multi-party multi-objective optimization, demonstrating improved efficiency over baseline methods and exploring coverage and approximation bounds in specific problem settings.
Contribution
It provides the first theoretical runtime analysis of cross-party recombination in MPMOPs, introducing novel algorithms and bounds for specific problem instances.
Findings
CPR-NSGA-II discovers Pareto-optimal solutions in O(n log n) evaluations.
Flattening objectives increases coverage burden compared to multi-party formulations.
Derived runtime bounds separate effects of local filling, recombination, and repair ambiguity.
Abstract
Multi-party multi-objective optimization problems (MPMOPs) require consensus among autonomous decision makers and therefore differ from flattened many-objective formulations. Existing runtime theory for multi-objective evolutionary algorithms is largely tailored to single-party Pareto-front approximation and does not directly explain common-solution search in MPMOPs. We investigate cross-party recombination in two representative settings. On MP-JCG, a pseudo-Boolean benchmark with an explicit gap region, we prove that a payoff-guided mutation baseline faces a gap-crossing bottleneck requiring \(\Theta(n^2)\) expected fitness evaluations. In contrast, an analytical CPR-NSGA-II variant discovers both common Pareto-optimal solutions in \(O(n\log n)\) expected evaluations by directly assembling complementary prefix and suffix templates distributed across party populations. Comparing this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
