TL;DR
IVF-TQ introduces a codebook-free residual layer in IVF indexing, enhancing robustness in streaming approximate nearest neighbor search by reducing failure modes associated with trained codebooks.
Contribution
The paper presents a streaming-robust IVF index with a codebook-free residual layer, backed by empirical evidence and theoretical error bounds, improving operational stability without retraining.
Findings
IVF-TQ maintains high recall under streaming ingestion, outperforming PQ.
Empirical results show IVF-TQ's robustness across different memory regimes.
Theoretical bounds support the residual quantizer design.
Abstract
We propose IVF-TQ, an IVF index with a codebook-free residual layer: a fixed random rotation followed by precomputed Lloyd-Max scalar quantization depending only on (b, d). Only the IVF coarse partition is trained. Building on TurboQuant (Zandieh et al., 2025), the design substantially reduces a key failure mode of trained-codebook ANN indexes (PQ, OPQ, ScaNN): staleness under streaming ingestion.Empirical (3 seeds): Per-batch PQ retraining does not recover the streaming gap at any tested bit budget (paired-t p > 0.28 everywhere). On streaming Deep-10M, IVF-TQ holds at 87.4% -> 86.6% (Delta = -0.80 +/- 0.10pp) while IVF-PQ degrades -3.23pp. A shuffled-i.i.d. control on SIFT-1M shows IVF-PQ losing -3.9pp without distribution shift. At higher PQ bit budgets (~1.5x IVF-TQ memory), absolute recall favors PQ as expected from rate-distortion (+6.1pp Deep-10M; +2.0pp SIFT-10M); the durable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
