The partial adoption trap: Coordination failure, trust, and cultural lock-in in health AI adoption
Ari Ercole

TL;DR
This paper models the systemic barriers to full health AI adoption, revealing a stable partial adoption trap caused by coordination, trust, and cultural failures, especially for high-value technologies.
Contribution
It introduces an evolutionary game theoretic model explaining partial adoption in health AI and identifies policy strategies to overcome the trap.
Findings
Partial adoption is stabilized by coordination, trust, and cultural failures.
High-value AI technologies are most prone to the partial adoption trap.
Policy targeting trust and sequencing can help escape the trap.
Abstract
Health artificial intelligence (AI) adoption presents a paradox: point-solution tools diffuse readily through clinical populations, yet system-change AI, which carries the greatest potential for pathway-level transformation, consistently stalls at partial adoption. An evolutionary game theoretic model is developed to explain this pattern. Doctors choose among three strategies: genuine adoption, partial adoption, and rejection, where genuine adoption is required for systemic benefits to materialise above a population threshold. The system is shown to be generically bistable, with a stable partial adoption equilibrium coexisting alongside full genuine adoption. The basin of attraction of the partial adoption trap is enlarged by three compounding failure modes: a threshold coordination failure arising from the non-appropriable nature of systemic benefits; a trust failure arising from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
