Responsible Agentic AI Requires Explicit Provenance
Jinwei Hu, Xinmiao Huang, Qisong He, Youcheng Sun, Yi Dong, Xiaowei Huang

TL;DR
This paper argues that explicit, traceable provenance across the agentic AI lifecycle is essential for assigning responsibility and ensuring trust, moving beyond subjective responsibility discussions.
Contribution
It formalizes the concept of provenance as a causal attribution function and responsibility tensor, and demonstrates its computability and intervention potential in agentic AI systems.
Findings
Provenance can be estimated and intervened online before harm occurs.
Explicit provenance addresses responsibility gaps across sociotechnical dimensions.
Preliminary experiments show provenance is feasible to compute and use in practice.
Abstract
Agentic AI is rapidly proliferating across diverse real-world domains such as software engineering, yet public trust has not kept pace. The central reason is that responsibility, despite being widely discussed, remains a subjective and unenforced concept, as no current agentic framework produces the quantifiable, traceable, and interventionable provenance needed to assign it when harm emerges from compositions no single party designed. We position that what is missing is not better benchmark-level evaluation but across the full agentic lifecycle, which is the only viable basis for making responsibility computable and actionable. We advance this agenda along four axes: establishing such provenance is a structural necessity by identifying responsibility gaps across sociotechnical dimensions, formalizing it must encode through a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
