A reversed solar illumination dependence of unintended emission from Starlink Direct-to-Cell satellites at 72-234 MHz with the EDA2
Haofan Dong, Houtianfu Wang, Hanlin Cai, and Ozgur B. Akan

TL;DR
This study analyzes the electromagnetic emissions of Starlink DTC satellites at 72-234 MHz, revealing a reversal in brightness between sunlight and eclipse conditions that challenges existing emission models.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed characterization of unintended emissions from Starlink DTC satellites and identifies a non-monotonic solar dependence, suggesting an active onboard source.
Findings
DTC satellites emit 1.45 times more flux density than Ku-only satellites.
Brightness in eclipse is higher than in sunlight for DTC, opposite for Ku-only.
A narrow 24 kHz emission feature near 230.627 MHz is identified, not explained by clock fundamentals.
Abstract
Second-generation Starlink Direct-to-Cell (DTC) satellites carry an additional payload for direct cellular phone connectivity whose unintended electromagnetic radiation (UEMR) at sub-300 MHz frequencies has not been individually characterised. We reanalyse 112,534 detections from 1,806 Starlink satellites observed with the Engineering Development Array version 2 (EDA2) at 21 frequencies between 72.685 and 234.375 MHz (Grigg et al. 2025), separating 175 DTC and 1,623 Ku-only v2-Mini comparison satellites via the McDowell General Catalogue (McDowell 2020). DTC satellites emit a range-corrected flux density 1.45x that of the Ku-only comparison (Cliff's delta = +0.30, p = 2.6e-11). At 230.469 MHz the XX detection fraction reaches 0.811 against a 0.481 baseline (p ~ 1e-274), and 11 of 21 frequency channels show Benjamini-Hochberg-significant polarisation anomalies. The DTC population is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
