Scientific Logicality Enriched Methodology for LLM Reasoning: A Practice in Physics
Zhaoxin Yu, Nan Xu, Kun Chen, Jiahao Zhao, Lei Wang, Wenji Mao

TL;DR
This paper introduces a methodology to enhance LLM reasoning in scientific tasks by focusing on logicality, demonstrated through physics problems, leading to improved reasoning validity and problem-solving performance.
Contribution
It systematically investigates LLM logicality in scientific reasoning and develops a logicality-enriched training approach using physics as a case study.
Findings
Training data improves logicality in LLM reasoning.
Enhanced logicality significantly boosts scientific problem-solving.
The methodology is validated across three different backbone LLMs.
Abstract
With the continuous advancement of reasoning abilities in Large Language Models (LLMs), their application to scientific reasoning tasks has gained significant research attention. Current research primarily emphasizes boosting LLMs' performance on scientific QA benchmarks by training on larger, more comprehensive datasets with extended reasoning chains. However, these approaches neglect the essence of the scientific reasoning process -- logicality, which is the rational foundation to ensure the validity of reasoning steps leading to reliable conclusions. In this work, we make the first systematic investigation into the internal logicality underlying LLM scientific reasoning, and develop a scientific logicality-enriched methodology, including a set of assessment criteria and data sampling methods for logicality-guided training, to improve the logical faithfulness as well as task…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
