Analyzing the role of tensile and hybrid fractures on the max-imum relief topography
Julien Gargani

TL;DR
This study compares fracture criteria in slope stability analysis, showing that the Griffith criterion with variable traction offers different and potentially more accurate maximum relief estimates than the traditional Mohr-Coulomb law.
Contribution
It introduces the use of the Griffith criterion with variable traction for large-scale relief stability analysis, contrasting it with the traditional Mohr-Coulomb law.
Findings
Griffith criterion predicts lower maximum relief than Mohr-Coulomb law.
Differences in relief estimates are comparable to geological phenomena impacts.
Results validated using Carrara marbles case study.
Abstract
Slope stability description through mechanical laws has important implication for Earth morphology understanding and risk assessment. Previous researches have showed that shear, tensile, and hybrid fractures can be observed experimentally and in the field, but their descriptions by a single equation is still an open debate. Fracture envelope able to describe contemporaneously these three fracture modes differ signif-icantly from the Mohr-Coulomb law. Despite the need to apply such a law at all scales, from the laboratory to the mountain range, the fracture criterion that characterizes all types of fractures is rarely used in geotechnical engineering and geological investiga-tions. In order to analyze the stability thresholds of large-scale relief, the current work examines the effects of considering the Griffith criterion with a variable rock traction instead of the Mohr-Coulomb law…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
