Single World Intervention Graphs as Distributions: A Framework for Causal Identification
Christian Bartels

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel perspective on single-world intervention graphs (SWIGs), viewing them as representations of both observed and interventional distributions to facilitate causal effect identification.
Contribution
It provides a systematic approach to derive identifying expressions for causal effects using SWIGs, extending front-door criteria to complex settings.
Findings
Back-door derivations align with existing literature.
Front-door derivations offer new pathways for complex interventions.
The approach bridges Rubin's and Pearl's frameworks.
Abstract
Causal inference seeks to estimate the effect of an intervention on an outcome using observed data, typically via Rubin's potential-outcome framework or Pearl's do-calculus. Following section 9 of Richardson and Robins (2013), this essay treats single-world intervention graphs (SWIGs) as representations of both the observed-data distribution and the interventional distribution, rather than as a bridge to potential outcomes. We demonstrate that this perspective provides a systematic way to derive identifying expressions for estimands defined by interventions on selected variables. Back-door derivations mirror those in existing literature, while front-door derivations offer a distinct pathway that extends more readily to complex settings. Conceptually, the method is simultaneously related to and distinct from Rubin's framework and Pearl's calculus.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
