Push and Pull in Community College Cross-Enrollment: Remoteness, Articulation, and Student Mobility
Conrad Borchers, Robin Schmucker, Ashutosh Tiwari, Zachary A. Pardos

TL;DR
This study analyzes how geographic remoteness and credit mobility influence cross-enrollment patterns in a community college system, revealing that less remote colleges have higher mobility and articulation impacts.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the joint effects of geographic constraints and institutional policies on student cross-enrollment in community colleges.
Findings
Less remote colleges have higher cross-enrollment.
Students in cross-enrollment are more likely to take articulated courses.
Higher equivalency ratios correlate with increased incoming cross-enrollment.
Abstract
Cross-enrollment across institutions can expand access to courses and support student progression. Still, little is known about how geographic constraints and institutional policies jointly shape cross-enrollment within community college (CC) systems. We adopt a push-pull framework: geographic remoteness constrains feasible cross-institution mobility, while credit mobility may attract enrollment expressed as articulation (CC-to-university: credit toward a four-year partner) and course equivalencies (CC-to-CC: equivalencies across the system). Using de-identified administrative records from a 12-institution community college system (100,547 students; 1,290,311 course enrollments), we quantify outgoing and incoming cross-enrollment and relate these patterns to institutional remoteness and credit mobility. We find that less remote colleges exhibit higher outgoing and incoming…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
