Lithium Experimental Application Platform (LEAP): Secondary-Containment Architecture for Flowing Liquid Lithium in Fusion Systems
Yufan Xu, Yoichi Momozaki, Michael Hvasta, Robert Kaita, Egemen Kolemen

TL;DR
This paper presents a hazard-based framework for designing secondary containment for flowing liquid lithium in fusion systems, demonstrated through the LEAP platform at PPPL.
Contribution
It introduces a semi-quantitative hazard complexity framework and applies it to design a practical, inert secondary containment architecture for lithium systems.
Findings
Inert, airtight secondary enclosure balances hazard reduction and complexity.
The architecture is deployable for lithium PFC development.
Framework is transferable to other reactive liquid metal systems.
Abstract
Flowing liquid lithium is a promising fusion technology because it can provide a renewable Plasma-Facing Component (PFC) surface, modify recycling, support power exhaust, and potentially connect plasma-facing components with fuel recovery. Its deployment, however, is limited by the need to manage chemical reactivity, fire and aerosol hazards, inert gas operation, maintainability, and rapid experimental iteration. This paper develops a semi-quantitative hazard complexity framework for selecting secondary containment architectures for flowing liquid lithium systems. The framework is applied to six representative containment scenarios and to the Lithium Experimental Application Platform (LEAP) at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. LEAP is under construction with a modular, room-scale argon gloveroom as an inert secondary containment boundary for a staged flowing lithium program with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
