Global Waterbody Calculator: A high-resolution global database of lakes and reservoirs depth-area-volume (D-A-V) relationships
Shengde Yu, Yukai Wu, Weikun Liao, and Philippe Van Cappellen

TL;DR
The paper introduces GLRDAV, a comprehensive high-resolution global database of lakes and reservoirs with detailed depth-area-volume relationships, validated against existing data and offering a valuable resource for water management.
Contribution
It provides a novel, high-resolution global database of D-A-V relationships for over 1.4 million waterbodies, integrating multiple data sources and validating polynomial models.
Findings
Higher-order polynomials (orders 4 and 5) perform best in modeling D-A-V relationships.
Power functions and lower-order polynomials are less accurate for complex or large waterbodies.
GLRDAV offers a flexible, scalable resource for hydrological and ecological applications.
Abstract
The new GLRDAV database assembles key morphometric characteristics for over 1.4 million lakes and reservoirs. By integrating data from HydroLAKES and GLOBathy, more than 17 million polynomial (orders 1-5) and power functions describing depth-area-volume (D-A-V) relationships at a 0.1 m depth resolution are presented. The D-A-V relationships are validated against existing databases (ReGeom and GRDL) that provide comparable or simplified global bathymetric relationships, as well as in situ measurements for four waterbodies in the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). The results show that higher-order polynomial equations (particularly orders 4 and 5) generally yield the lowest RMSE and highest goodness-of-fit (i.e., R^2). Although power functions and lower-order polynomials can offer reasonable representations for simpler and shallower systems, they typically underperform when applied to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
