The Collapse of Unentangled Stoquastic Merlin-Arthur Proof Systems
William Gay, Fernando Granha Jeronimo

TL;DR
This paper proves that unentangled stoquastic Merlin-Arthur proof systems have no more power than their entangled counterparts, showing a collapse in their computational complexity class.
Contribution
It introduces a positive de Finetti theorem for nonnegative matrices and demonstrates that entanglement does not enhance the power of stoquastic verification.
Findings
Unentangled and entangled stoquastic proof systems are equivalent in power.
The positive de Finetti theorem approximates nonnegative matrix values via spectral relaxation.
The proof establishes that StoqMa equals StoqMa(k) and is contained in PSPACE.
Abstract
Entanglement and interference are among the most fundamental properties of quantum mechanics. In this work, we investigate the role and power of interference in the context of detecting entanglement. We do so from a computational complexity lens by proving that unentanglement gives no additional power to stoquastic Merlin-Arthur verification. For every polynomial number of provers , \[ \text{StoqMa}(k)=\text{StoqMa} . \] Conceptually, the proof separates the role of entanglement from the role of interference: once destructive interference is ruled out by stoquasticity, the product-state constraint can be absorbed into a polynomially larger one-witness stoquastic verification. The main analytic ingredient is a positive, value-based de Finetti theorem for separately symmetric extensions. If is an entrywise nonnegative positive semidefinite contraction on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
