Analytical method for computing the covariance matrix of cosmic shear two-point correlation function
Kosuke Nagura, Ryo Terasawa, Taisei Terawaki, Masahiro Takada

TL;DR
This paper evaluates analytical methods for estimating the covariance matrix of cosmic shear two-point correlation functions, emphasizing the importance of modeling off-diagonal elements accurately for reliable cosmological analyses.
Contribution
It compares several analytical covariance estimators, highlighting the limitations of the improved Narrow Kernel Approximation and demonstrating the effectiveness of the weighted quartic-counts method.
Findings
The iNKA method fails to reproduce off-diagonal covariance components accurately.
The weighted quartic-counts method shows better agreement with Gaussian simulations.
Accurate off-diagonal modeling is crucial for reliable weak lensing covariance estimates.
Abstract
Accurate estimation of the covariance matrix of cosmic shear statistics is essential for cosmological analyses using current and upcoming wide-area weak lensing surveys. In this work, we investigate analytical methods for computing the Gaussian covariance matrix of the cosmic shear two-point correlation function (2PCF), taking into account the effects of finite survey geometry. We compute the covariance of 2PCF based on the improved Narrow Kernel Approximation (iNKA), with a projection using the Legendre transformation. We also consider other analytical covariance estimators, the approximation and the weighted quartic-counts method. We evaluate the accuracy of those analytical methods using the convergence fields with the HSC Year 3 survey mask as a test case. We find that the covariance of the 2PCF obtained by using the iNKA does not reproduce the covariance measured…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
