Lamarckian Inheritance in Dynamic Environments: How Key Variables Affect Evolutionary Dynamics
K. Ege de Bruin, Kyrre Glette, Kai Olav Ellefsen

TL;DR
This paper investigates how Lamarckian inheritance influences the evolution of robots in dynamic environments, showing that environmental predictability and conflict levels determine its effectiveness.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the benefits of Lamarckian inheritance depend on environmental variables and introduces a sensor-based approach to enhance its advantages.
Findings
Lamarckian inheritance underperforms when environmental changes are conflicting and unpredictable.
Adding environmental sensors improves Lamarckian inheritance benefits in conflicting environments.
The effectiveness of Lamarckian inheritance varies with environmental predictability and conflict levels.
Abstract
The co-optimization of a robot's body and brain presents a coupled challenge: the morphology constrains which control strategies are effective, while the control determines how well the morphology performs. To address this, we combine morphology optimization as evolution with controller optimization as lifetime learning, utilizing Lamarckian inheritance to transfer learned controller parameters from parent to offspring. In dynamic environments, existing literature presents conflicting evidence: while traditional evolutionary theory often suggests Lamarckian inheritance lacks benefit, recent studies in evolutionary robotics indicate it can improve performance. We hypothesize that this is because previous works have not included all relevant variables with dynamic environments. In this work, we show that the benefit of Lamarckian inheritance depends on two variables: how conflicting the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
