TL;DR
This paper evaluates foundation models for EEG handwriting decoding, revealing current models underperform compared to specialized models and highlighting key challenges for future research.
Contribution
It introduces a new dataset for EEG handwriting decoding, critically assesses foundation models' performance, and identifies specific challenges to guide future work.
Findings
Knowledge of movement-onset significantly affects decoding accuracy.
Improving test-time signal quality greatly enhances performance.
Scaling training data alone does not let foundation models outperform specialized models.
Abstract
Recent attempts at creating Foundation Models (FMs) for Electroencephalography (EEG) have achieved state-of-the-art performance on multiple tasks including Motor Imagery (MI). These MI tasks have typically involved coarse classification between imagined limb movements. However, the development of foundation models necessitates diverse datasets, both for pretraining and evaluating the progress of these models. In this work, we propose handwriting decoding as a challenging motor task for FMs. We show that several existing datasets are potentially confounded, and introduce a dataset that more rigorously evaluates models. On this dataset, we find that current FMs, despite showing SOTA performance in multiple MI datasets are outperformed by smaller task-specific models. We also highlight challenges specific to EEG-based handwriting decoding to inform future work. In our 4-letter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
