Measuring contributions from single and multiple atmospheric secondary cosmic rays in the {\it Princess Sirindhorn Neutron Monitor} using cross-counter neutron time delay distributions
Warit Mitthumsiri (1), Alejandro S\'aiz (1), David Ruffolo (1), Paul Evenson (2), Pierre-Simon Mangeard (2), Waraporn Nuntiyakul (3), Chanoknan Banglieng (4) ((1) Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, (2) Bartol Research Institute

TL;DR
This study uses new electronics to analyze cross-counter neutron time delay distributions in the Princess Sirindhorn Neutron Monitor, revealing insights into secondary cosmic ray contributions and validating atmospheric shower simulations.
Contribution
It introduces a method to measure and correct cross-counter leader fractions, enhancing understanding of secondary particle contributions in neutron monitors.
Findings
Nearly constant leader fraction (~0.997) at large counter separation
Approximately 4.5% of counts are from secondary particles in the same shower
Monte Carlo simulations confirm multiple secondary particles contribute independently of distance
Abstract
Neutron monitors (NMs) are ground-based devices designed to measure cosmic-ray count rates by monitoring atmospheric neutrons from cosmic-ray showers. We present results from new electronics that have recorded cross-counter time delay histograms for the {\it Princess Sirindhorn Neutron Monitor} (PSNM) at the summit of Doi Inthanon, Thailand. From these histograms, we have extracted the cross-counter leader fraction () and corrected it for atmospheric effects. For large counter separation, we measure nearly constant , implying that 0.3\% of counts in one counter are temporally associated with later counts on a given distant counter. Monte Carlo simulations confirm that individual secondary particles cannot account for the associated counts at large counter separation, which instead requires a contribution from multiple secondary particles in the same cosmic ray shower…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
