3DEditSafe: Defending 3D Editing Pipelines from Unsafe Generation
Nicole Meng, Zheyuan Liu, Meng Jiang, Yingjie Lao

TL;DR
This paper introduces 3DEditSafe, a novel safety framework for 3D generative editing pipelines that effectively reduces unsafe content propagation during multi-view scene manipulation.
Contribution
It presents the first safety-regularized 3D editing method combining multiple safety guidance techniques to prevent unsafe content in text-driven 3D scene editing.
Findings
3DEditSafe significantly reduces unsafe semantic alignment in 3D edits.
2D safety guidance alone is insufficient for preventing unsafe 3D generation.
There is a safety-quality tradeoff where stronger safety measures may reduce fidelity or introduce artifacts.
Abstract
Recent advances in 3D generative editing, particularly pipelines based on 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS), have achieved high-fidelity, multi-view-consistent scene manipulation from text prompts. However, we find that these pipelines also introduce new safety risks when unsafe prompts produce edits that are propagated and optimized across views. In this work, we study unsafe generation in 3D editing pipelines and show that such behavior can lead to coherent, undesirable Not-Safe-For-Work (NSFW) content in the final 3D representation. To address this, we propose 3DEditSafe, a safety-regularized 3D editing framework that constrains unsafe semantic propagation during optimization. 3DEditSafe combines generation-stage safety guidance with rendered-view 3D safety regularization, safe semantic projection, residue suppression, and mask-aware preservation to steer optimization away from unsafe…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
