Representation Without Reward: A JEPA Audit for LLM Fine-Tuning

TL;DR

This paper investigates whether training auxiliary tasks on hidden representations of language models improves their task performance, finding that most do not produce significant gains in a rigorous statistical setting.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive empirical evaluation of various auxiliary training methods for LLMs, revealing that they generally do not enhance task metrics despite altering hidden-state geometry.

Findings

Most auxiliaries do not significantly improve task metrics after correction.

Decoder-visible JEPA achieves the first positive auxiliary-cross-entropy gradient cosine.

Null results are consistent across different fine-tuning regimes and seeds.

Abstract

Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPAs) propose that a model should learn more useful abstractions when trained to predict latent representations rather than observed outputs. For autoregressive language-model fine-tuning the principle entails a stricter requirement: the induced hidden-state geometry must reach the language-model head \emph{and} improve the decoded task metric. We test that requirement under a fixed Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct LoRA harness on natural-language-to-regex generation, comparing twenty-two training-time auxiliaries across trajectory-shape regularisation, distributional constraints, predictor/target asymmetry, Fisher-metric Jacobi residuals, and a decoder-visible JEPA objective constructed to lie in cross-entropy's positive cone. The empirical answer is a structured null: several auxiliaries clear single-cell paired $\alpha = 0.10$ without correction (T3-Local at $\Delta = +2.53$~pp, $p = 0.003$ being the strongest), but none survives Bonferroni or Holm--Bonferroni at the relevant family-wise threshold, even though many change curvature, anisotropy, variance, and gradient direction. Decoder-visible JEPA yields the first positive auxiliary--cross-entropy gradient cosine in the study, yet exact match remains inside seed noise; a full-fine-tuning replication of the same auxiliary at $n = 5$ seeds reproduces the null on both benchmarks (TURK: $\Delta = +0.04$~pp, $p_{\text{paired}} = 0.96$; SYNTH: $\Delta = +0.52$~pp, $p_{\text{paired}} = 0.28$), so the null is robust across LoRA and full fine-tuning for the decoder-visible construction. Hidden-state representation work and decoded-task accuracy are therefore weakly coupled in this regime; we accordingly reframe LLM-domain JEPA evaluation as a coupling problem, in which the operative question is under which metrics useful hidden geometry becomes decoder-visible task signal.