Deceptive Cookies: Consent by Design -- A Mixed Methods Study
Liv Hilde Sj{\o}flot, Tobias A. Opsahl

TL;DR
This study investigates how cookie consent banners influence user behavior, revealing that deceptive designs often lead users to consent unintentionally, raising concerns about user autonomy and privacy.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on how cookie banner design impacts user decisions, highlighting issues with current consent mechanisms and legislation.
Findings
Users tend to accept cookies despite wanting to reject them.
Deceptive banner patterns influence user consent decisions.
Withdrawing consent is significantly more time-consuming than giving it.
Abstract
While companies increasingly rely on data, especially when it comes to targeted advertising, adapting content to users, selling data and training machine learning models, the collection of data raises privacy concerns. One way of collecting data is by using HTTP cookies when interacting with a website. Legal regulations require service providers to collect consent for some forms of cookie collection, which is often acquired through \emph{cookie consent banners}, but their effectiveness has been debated. This study aims to understand what influences users' experience and behaviour when managing their cookie consent, by investigating the gap between their stated privacy preferences and their actual actions. A mixed methods approach was used, collecting data from a usability test and a survey (N=20). The results showed that although participants generally want to reject cookie collection,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
