Toward Securing AI Agents Like Operating Systems
Lukas Pirch, Micha Horlboge, Patrick Gro{\ss}mann, Syeda Mahnur Asif, Klim Kireev, Thorsten Holz, Konrad Rieck

TL;DR
This paper examines security challenges in LLM-based autonomous agents by drawing parallels with operating systems, analyzing vulnerabilities, and proposing security best practices.
Contribution
It introduces a unified agent architecture, systematically analyzes attack vectors, and offers security recommendations inspired by OS security techniques.
Findings
Several protection mechanisms fail under modest attacker capabilities.
Secure operation requires detailed system knowledge and careful configuration.
Many vulnerabilities can be mitigated using established OS security techniques.
Abstract
Autonomous agents based on large language models (LLMs) are rapidly emerging as a general-purpose technology, with recent systems such as OpenClaw extending their capabilities through broad tool use, third-party skills, and deeper integration into user environments. At the same time, these agentic systems introduce substantial security risks by combining unconstrained capabilities with access to sensitive user data. In this work, we investigate the security of LLM-based agents through the lens of operating systems. We argue that both face strikingly similar challenges in isolating resources, separating privileges, and mediating communication. Guided by this perspective, we survey the current landscape of open-source agents, derive a unified agent architecture, and systematically analyze potential attack vectors. To validate this analysis, we conduct a case study evaluating four widely…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
