Functional and Density-Driven Errors in Density Functional Theory: Quantum Monte Carlo Benchmarks for Solids
Ayoub Aouina, Nicolas Tancogne-Dejean, and Silvana Botti

TL;DR
This study systematically analyzes errors in density functional approximations for solids, distinguishing between functional-driven and density-driven errors using quantum Monte Carlo benchmarks, revealing material-dependent error behaviors.
Contribution
It provides a detailed separation of error sources in DFT for solids and offers practical guidance for functional selection based on material properties.
Findings
Functional errors usually dominate over density-driven errors.
Certain functionals perform exceptionally well for specific materials like silicon and sodium chloride.
High-quality densities reduce density-driven errors across all tested systems.
Abstract
We introduce a systematic analysis of density functional approximation errors in solids by separating functional-driven from density-driven contributions using quantum Monte Carlo densities of silicon, sodium chloride, and copper as reference. Typically, functional errors dominate, but we identify important exceptions where density-driven errors exceed functional errors by factors of 2-3, notably for SOGGA11 and {\tau}-HCTH in the semiconductor and the insulator. Material dependence is striking: 63% of functionals show error cancellation in silicon versus 18% in copper, and only five functionals surpass LDA accuracy for metallic copper even with exact densities. For silicon and sodium chloride, GILL or BECKE exchange combined with PBE, PW91, or P86 correlation achieves near-exact xc energies on QMC densities, while copper requires specialized functionals like PBEsol or PBELYP.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
