Agentic AI in Industry: Adoption Level and Deployment Barriers
Spyridon Alvanakis Apostolou, Jan Bosch, Helena Holmstr\"om Olsson

TL;DR
This study explores how industrial organizations adopt agentic AI, revealing a capability-deployment verification gap caused by technical and organizational barriers, with most companies at early adoption levels.
Contribution
It provides empirical insights into the current state of agentic AI adoption in industry and identifies key barriers hindering advanced deployment.
Findings
Most companies are at early AI adoption levels.
A verification gap prevents higher-level AI integration.
Barriers include LLM constraints, performance issues, non-determinism, and data confidentiality.
Abstract
Agentic AI systems are entering software engineering workflows, yet empirical evidence on how industrial organizations actually adopt them remains sparse. We present a qualitative interview study with sixteen practitioners across twelve companies of varying size and domain. This study characterizes the current agentic AI adoption state of these companies, employing a six-level maturity framework adapted from established AI-driven organizations. The findings reveal that seven companies operate at Level~1 (AI Assistants), four companies at Level~2 (AI Compensators), and only one in Level~3 (Multi-Agent Orchestration), with large and safety-regulated organizations among the most advanced adopters. The primary finding is a capability-deployment verification gap, four companies demonstrated higher-level experimental AI capabilities but cannot integrate them into production workflows because…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
