Parametrization of the primordial power spectrum in loop quantum cosmology
Almudena Guill\'en, Kai Langer, Guillermo A. Mena Marug\'an, Niklas Rodenb\"ucher, Antonio Vicente-Becerril

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new parametrization of the primordial power spectrum in loop quantum cosmology, accounting for pre-inflationary bounce effects, and shows it fits Planck data well at high multipoles.
Contribution
It develops a robust, accurate parametrization of the primordial power spectrum incorporating pre-inflationary physics in loop quantum cosmology.
Findings
The parametrization depends on bounce e-folds and a suppression scale linked to the bounce energy density.
The tensor-to-scalar ratio matches standard $\\Lambda$CDM$ when scales are not in the suppressed region.
Both approaches fit Planck data well at high multipoles and improve fit at low multipoles.
Abstract
We investigate the imprints on the angular power spectra of cosmological perturbations of a pre-inflationary bounce phase, as described by the hybrid and dressed metric approaches to loop quantum cosmology. For this purpose, we derive a new parametrization of the primordial power spectrum at the end of the inflationary regime. Apart from slow-roll coefficients and cosmological parameters that are present in the standard cosmological scenario without quantum modifications, this parametrization additionally depends only on pre-inflationary physics. More specifically, we find a dependence on the number of e-folds during the bounce epoch and on a characteristic suppression scale which, given the e-folds accumulated during cosmic evolution, is determined by the energy density at the bounce. Recall that this density depends on the Immirzi parameter and the area gap known from LQG. This leads…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
