Resolving Action Bottleneck: Agentic Reinforcement Learning Informed by Token-Level Energy
Langzhou He, Junyou Zhu, Yue Zhou, Zhengyao Gu, Junhua Liu, Wei-Chieh Huang, Henry Peng Zou, David Wipf, Philip S. Yu, and Qitian Wu

TL;DR
This paper identifies the action bottleneck in agentic reinforcement learning, showing that current methods misallocate training signals, and proposes ActFocus, a token reweighting approach that improves performance across multiple environments.
Contribution
The paper introduces ActFocus, a simple token reweighting method informed by energy-based modeling, to better allocate training signals in agentic reinforcement learning.
Findings
ActFocus outperforms PPO and GRPO across four environments.
It yields up to 65.2 and 63.7 percentage point improvements.
Token-level training signals concentrate on action tokens, revealing the Action Bottleneck.
Abstract
Agentic reinforcement learning trains large language models using multi-turn trajectories that interleave long reasoning traces with short environment-facing actions. Common policy-gradient methods, such as PPO and GRPO, treat each token in a trajectory equally, leading to uniform credit assignment. In this paper, we critically demonstrate that such uniform credit assignment largely misallocates token-level training signals. From an energy-based modeling perspective, we show that token-level training signals, quantified by their correlations with reward variance of different rollouts sampled from a given prompt, concentrate sharply on action tokens rather than reasoning tokens, even though action tokens account for only a small fraction of the trajectory. We refer to this phenomenon as the Action Bottleneck. Motivated by this observation, we propose an embarrassingly simple token…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
