Systematic Evaluation of Stencil Configuration, Forcing Scheme, and Resolution Effects in the Stratified Taylor--Green Vortex: A Lattice Boltzmann Study
Hongxuan Zhang

TL;DR
This paper systematically evaluates the lattice Boltzmann method's accuracy in simulating stratified turbulence, focusing on stencil configurations, forcing schemes, and resolution, validated against spectral DNS benchmarks.
Contribution
It identifies optimal LBM configurations and resolution requirements for accurate stratified turbulence simulation, providing practical guidelines for high-fidelity modeling.
Findings
D3Q27×19 configuration balances accuracy and efficiency
Potential energy and small-scale structures are more resolution-dependent
Velocity-shift forcing schemes reduce error by ~45.54% under stratification
Abstract
The rigorous simulation of stratified turbulence remains challenging due to pronounced flow anisotropy, suppressed vertical transport, and high sensitivity to numerical dissipation. This study systematically evaluates the predictive capability of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) for a three-dimensional stratified Taylor--Green vortex. Within a double-distribution-function framework under the Boussinesq approximation, we examine the influence of stencil configurations, forcing formulations, and spatial resolutions up to , with validation against spectral DNS benchmarks. The results demonstrate that the D3Q2719 configuration achieves an optimal balance between numerical accuracy and computational efficiency, accurately reproducing the temporal evolution of kinetic and potential energies as well as the characteristic double-peak dissipation structure. Grid-sensitivity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
