Toward Covert Quantum Computing

TL;DR

This paper introduces covert quantum computing, a method to hide quantum computations from adversaries sharing the same hardware, using information theory and quantum game theory to analyze detection risks and crosstalk effects.

Contribution

It proposes a new framework for covert quantum computing, derives bounds on detectability based on circuit layout, and experimentally investigates crosstalk on real quantum processors.

Findings

Detection information scales with the square root of the number of qubits.

Long-range crosstalk beyond border qubits can be exploited as a side channel.

Crosstalk from drive and control lines may weaken covertness and cause unintended interactions.

Abstract

As quantum computers become available through multi-tenant cloud platforms, ensuring privacy against adversaries sharing the same quantum processing unit becomes critical. We introduce and explore \emph{covert quantum computing}, a new concept that ensures an adversary with access to all other quantum computational units (QCUs) of a quantum computer cannot detect computation on the subset that they cannot access. Analogous to covert communication, we employ information theory. However, since here the adversary controls the systems used for detection, we require a richer framework for covertness analysis that accounts for the use of quantum memories and adaptive operations. Thus, we adopt the \emph{quantum-strategy} framework used in quantum game theory and memory channel discrimination. Current quantum computers use planar graph circuit layouts and typically assume nearest-neighbor crosstalk. We derive discrete isoperimetric inequalities to show that, for an $n$-qubit circuit under this model, only $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{n})$ border qubits provide detection information to the adversary. We then explore this scaling law on IQM's 54-qubit \emph{Emerald} processor and IBM's 156-qubit \emph{ibm\_fez} machine employing the Heron 2 architecture. We implement Ramsey experiments on qubits not used in computation, and detect nearest-neighbor crosstalk, as expected. However, we also observe long-range coupling effects beyond the border qubits, revealing a side channel that the adversary can exploit. We hypothesize that this long-range crosstalk is induced by leakage from the drive and control lines. Beyond weakening covertness, it exposes co-tenants to both adversarial and unintended crosstalk and degrades circuits that span spatially distributed qubits, motivating further work on spatial isolation and crosstalk characterization.