On the (non-)resilience of encrypted controllers to covert attacks
Philipp Binfet, Janis Adamek, Moritz Schulze Darup

TL;DR
This paper examines the vulnerabilities of encrypted control systems to covert attacks and proposes a verifiable computation approach to enhance their resilience without additional communication costs.
Contribution
It demonstrates the inherent malleability of homomorphic encryption schemes in encrypted control and introduces a verifiable computation method to improve attack resilience.
Findings
Encrypted control schemes are vulnerable to covert attacks due to homomorphic encryption malleability.
Homomorphic encryption alone cannot ensure integrity against certain attacks in control systems.
Verifiable computation can provide asymptotic security without extra communication overhead.
Abstract
The security of networked control systems (NCS) is receiving increasing attention from both cyber-security and system-theoretic perspectives. The former focuses on classical IT security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, and availability of process data, while the latter investigates tailored attacks (and detection schemes), including covert and zero-dynamics attacks. Confidentiality in control systems can, for instance, be achieved by securely outsourcing the evaluation of the controller to third-party platforms, such as cloud services. The underlying technology enabling such secure computation often is homomorphic encryption (HE). Recent works in encrypted control have proposed modifications to underlying HE schemes to achieve not only confidentiality but also resilience to certain types of integrity attacks. While extensions in this direction are desirable in principle, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
