What Should Explanations Contain? A Human-Centered Explanation Content Model for Local, Post-Hoc Explanations
Helmut Degen

TL;DR
This paper develops a comprehensive human-centered content model for local, post-hoc explanations in industrial AI, based on qualitative analysis and expert validation.
Contribution
It introduces a 14-code explanation content model organized into four groups, validated for content adequacy and coding reliability.
Findings
Identified 14 explanation content codes relevant for industrial AI explanations.
Validated the content model with expert review and high inter-coder reliability.
Established a foundation for eliciting and evaluating explanation content in industrial AI systems.
Abstract
Which categories of explanation content are relevant for users of industrial AI systems, and how can those categories be organized for local, post-hoc explanations? To address these questions, a hybrid inductive-deductive qualitative content analysis was applied to 325 meaning units drawn from six user studies in building technology, manufacturing, AI software development, and hospital cybersecurity. The inductive phase produced an initial twelve-code structure. A theory-informed coverage assessment and expert review then added two further codes, Rule base and What-if backward, that were not instantiated in the corpus but correspond to system architectures documented in the XAI literature. The resulting fourteen-code model is organized into four groups: rule-based, causal, epistemic (actual), and epistemic (similar), with twelve codes grounded in the corpus and two as theoretical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
