Sheaf-Theoretic Transport and Obstruction for Detecting Scientific Theory Shift in AI Agents
David N. Olivieri, Roque J. Hern\'andez

TL;DR
This paper introduces a sheaf-theoretic framework to detect when AI agents' scientific theories can be transported or need extension, using obstruction measures to identify theory shifts.
Contribution
It develops a finite sheaf-theoretic method for diagnosing theory transport failures and extensions in AI agents, with a benchmark evaluation.
Findings
Intended deformations or extensions usually have the lowest obstruction scores.
The framework effectively separates deformation within a language from its extension.
Obstruction ranking can identify the most plausible theory shift candidate.
Abstract
Scientific theory shift in AI agents requires more than fitting equations to data. An artificial scientific agent must detect whether an existing representational framework remains transportable into a new regime, or whether its language has become locally-to-globally obstructed and must be extended. This paper develops a finite sheaf-theoretic framework for detecting theory-shift candidates through transport and obstruction. Contexts are organized as a local-to-global structure in which source, overlap, target, and validation charts are fitted, restricted, and tested for gluing. Obstruction measures failure of coherence through residual fit, overlap incompatibility, constraint violation, limiting-relation failure, and representational cost. We evaluate the framework on a controlled transition-card benchmark designed to separate deformation within a source language from extension of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
