A Tale of Two Hartle-Hawking Wave Functions: Fully Gravitational vs Partially Frozen
Galit Anikeeva, Rapha\"el Dulac, Zixia Wei, Mengyang Zhang

TL;DR
This paper compares fully gravitational and partially frozen Hartle-Hawking wave functions in AdS spacetime, analyzing their properties, one-loop corrections, and phase behaviors, revealing the impact of boundary conditions on the gravitational path integral.
Contribution
It explicitly analyzes the fully gravitational Hartle-Hawking wave function in AdS$_3$ and AdS$_2$, and compares phase behaviors with partially frozen cases, highlighting the role of boundary dynamics.
Findings
Fully gravitational wave function develops a nontrivial one-loop phase.
Partially frozen wave function remains real and positive.
Phase behavior is controlled by whether the boundary is dynamical or fixed.
Abstract
We revisit the Hartle-Hawking wave function in AdS spacetime, where natural spatial slices are open and require an additional spacetime boundary. This leads to two constructions: a fully gravitational wave function, in which the boundary configuration is integrated over, and a partially frozen one, in which it is fixed, as in AdS/CFT. To illustrate the fully gravitational construction, we explicitly analyze it in AdS Einstein gravity and AdS Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity. We then evaluate the one-loop correction to the hyperbolic-ball partition function in -dimensional AdS Einstein gravity, expected to give the leading contribution to the wave-function norm. We demonstrate that the fully gravitational hyperbolic ball partition function, where the boundary fluctuates, develops a nontrivial one-loop phase of , analogous to that of the sphere partition function in dS…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
