Generating synthetic computed tomography for radiotherapy: SynthRAD2025 challenge report
Viktor Rogowski, Maarten L. Terpstra, Niklas Wahl, Florian Kamp, Erik van der Bijl, Arthur Jr. Galapon, Christopher Kurz, Bowen Xin, Zhengxiang Sun, Hollie Min, Gregg Belous, Jason Dowling, Yan Xia, Siyuan Mei, Fuxin Fan, Arthur Longuefosse, Javier Sequeiro Gonzalez

TL;DR
SynthRAD2025 benchmarked deep learning methods for generating synthetic CT images from MRI and CBCT scans across multiple European centers, demonstrating clinical relevance but highlighting ongoing challenges in dose accuracy and tissue interface errors.
Contribution
This study provides a large-scale, multi-center benchmark of deep learning sCT methods, emphasizing the importance of dose-based evaluation for clinical validation.
Findings
Deep learning methods achieved clinically relevant sCT quality, especially for CBCT-to-CT.
Image quality correlates strongly with segmentation accuracy but less with dosimetric accuracy.
Head-and-neck cases showed more consistent results than thoracic and abdominal cases.
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) requires precise dose delivery over multiple fractions, with CT fundamental for treatment planning due to its electron density information. Repeated CT acquisitions impose radiation exposure and logistical burdens, MRI lacks electron density, and cone-beam CT (CBCT) requires correction for dose calculation. Synthetic CT (sCT) generation addresses these by converting MRI or CBCT into CT-equivalent images with accurate Hounsfield Unit (HU) values, enabling MRI-only RT and CBCT-based adaptive workflows. Building on SynthRAD2023, SynthRAD2025 benchmarked sCT methods on 2,362 patients from five European centers across head and neck, thorax, and abdomen. Two tasks: MRI-to-CT (890 cases) and CBCT-to-CT (1,472 cases), evaluated via image similarity (MAE, PSNR, MS-SSIM), segmentation (Dice, HD95), and dosimetric metrics from photon and proton plans. With 803 participants…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
