Magnetar-powered long gamma-ray bursts and connection to superluminous supernovae and fast radio bursts
Yu-Qi Zhou, Shuang-Xi Yi, Yu-Peng Yang, Yan-Kun Qu, Ning Gai, Yan-Ke Tang, Fa-Yin Wang

TL;DR
This study analyzes X-ray afterglow data from 169 long gamma-ray bursts to infer magnetar properties, revealing correlations and differences with superluminous supernovae and fast radio bursts, supporting the magnetar central engine model.
Contribution
It provides a large, model-consistent sample of magnetar-candidate GRBs with inferred physical parameters and correlations, advancing understanding of their progenitors and evolution.
Findings
Both subsamples follow the Dainotti correlation with a slope near -1.
A significant correlation exists between magnetic field strength and initial spin period.
GRB magnetars have systematically stronger magnetic fields than those powering SLSNe, but similar to FRB sources.
Abstract
Based on X-ray afterglow observations from the Swift satellite, we construct a sample of 169 long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) exhibiting the canonical magnetar plateau signature, i.e., a plateau followed by a decay. We derive the plateau luminosity and break time for each burst by performing Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) fits to the light curves, and estimate pseudo-redshifts for bursts lacking known redshifts via the Amati relation. The fundamental magnetar parameters are subsequently inferred: the surface polar magnetic field strength G and the initial spin period ms. Statistical analysis shows that both the known-redshift subsample and the full sample follow the Dainotti correlation between and with a slope close to , supporting a constant energy injection rate during the plateau phase.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
