Exploring Human-Robot Collaboration: Analysis of Interaction Modalities in Challenging Tasks
Simone Arreghini, Cristina Iani, Alessandro Giusti, Valeria Villani, Lorenzo Sabattini, Antonio Paolillo

TL;DR
This study compares passive, reactive, and proactive human-robot interaction modes in a tower assembly task, finding proactive support enhances user experience despite longer completion times.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates three interaction modalities, highlighting the benefits of proactive robot assistance in collaborative tasks.
Findings
Proactive modality was most preferred by 67% of participants.
78% of participants found proactive support most useful.
Robot assistance increased task completion time.
Abstract
This work compares three interaction modalities for human-robot collaboration: passive, reactive, and proactive. We studied 18 participants assembling a seven-layer colored tower from memory while using nearby and distant blocks. In the passive modality participants worked alone; in the reactive modality a mobile robot helped only upon request; in the proactive modality it initiated brick delivery and error signaling without explicit requests. Although robot assistance increased completion time, most participants preferred collaboration: 67% preferred proactive behavior and 78% judged it most useful. These results suggest that timely proactive support can improve user experience in controlled collaborative tasks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
