What Do You Think I Think? Accounting for Human Beliefs Using Second-Order Theory of Mind
Patrick Callaghan, Reid Simmons, Henny Admoni

TL;DR
This paper introduces a second-order Theory of Mind framework enabling agents to model and adapt to human beliefs and biases, improving interaction quality through tailored feedback.
Contribution
It develops a ToM-2 model based on I-POMDPs to detect and account for human cognitive biases during interactions, enhancing feedback effectiveness.
Findings
ToM-2 model improves informativeness of agent feedback.
Participants found ToM-2 feedback more useful.
Significant reduction in belief discrepancies during interactions.
Abstract
Discrepancies between an agent's actual knowledge and what a person thinks the agent knows can hinder interactions. If an agent could detect such discrepancies, it could provide feedback to account for them and improve current and future interactions. Using the I-POMDP as a framework for a second-order Theory of Mind (ToM-2), this work endows an agent with the ability to model the evolution of a person's erroneous beliefs about an agent and the cognitive biases and heuristics (CBH) from which they arise. In doing so, the agent can detect when CBH might be at play during an interaction and adaptively generate feedback that accounts for them. An in-person user study shows how a ToM-2 learner can account for the effects of a teacher's CBH to significantly improve the informativeness of teacher actions, and subjective results suggest people find the ToM-2 learner's feedback more useful.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
