On the number of distinct spanning trees in pseudorandom graphs
Yiting Wang

TL;DR
This paper extends Otter's classical result by showing that pseudorandom graphs with certain degree and eigenvalue conditions contain exponentially many distinct unlabelled spanning trees, close to the maximum in complete graphs.
Contribution
It proves that pseudorandom graphs with high degree and spectral gap have nearly as many spanning trees as complete graphs, generalizing Otter's result.
Findings
Pseudorandom graphs have at least (-)^n spanning trees.
The number of spanning trees is exponential in the number of vertices.
The result holds for graphs with sufficiently large degree and spectral gap.
Abstract
A celebrated result of Otter says the number of distinct unlabelled spanning trees in is up to subexponential factors for an absolute constant . In this note, we prove that for every , there are constants and such that every -graph with and has at least distinct unlabelled spanning trees.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
