Belief-Space Residual Risk for Automated Driving under Localization Uncertainty
Nijinshan Karunainayagam, Nils Gehrke, Frank Diermeyer

TL;DR
This paper extends residual risk metrics for automated driving to account for localization uncertainty by modeling ego pose as a Gaussian belief and integrating it into risk estimation.
Contribution
It introduces a belief-space residual risk formulation that explicitly models ego pose uncertainty in risk assessment for autonomous vehicles.
Findings
Incorporates localization uncertainty into residual risk estimation.
Uses a particle-based framework for risk computation.
Models ego pose as a Gaussian distribution within the risk assessment.
Abstract
Residual risk metrics have recently been introduced to assess the safety implications of automated driving systems. Existing approaches typically assume a deterministic ego pose and concentrate mainly on perception errors related to surrounding objects and latency effects. In practice, however, automated vehicles operate under considerable localization uncertainty, especially in complex urban settings and in adverse weather conditions. This work extends the spatial residual risk formulation to the belief space by explicitly modeling ego pose uncertainty as a Gaussian distribution. Residual risk is reformulated as the expected degradation-induced risk over the ego pose belief distribution. Within a particle-based risk estimation framework, localization uncertainty is incorporated into the computation of collision probabilities through covariance fusion of ego and object uncertainties.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
