From EEG Cleaning to Decoding: The Role of Artifact Rejection in MI-based BCIs
Davoud Hajhassani, Bruno Aristimunha, Paul-Adrien Graignic, Apolline Mellot, Lionel Kusch, Arnaud Delorme, Thomas Semah, Arnault H. Caillet

TL;DR
This paper introduces FAAR, a lightweight automated artifact rejection method for EEG-based motor imagery BCIs, improving robustness and consistency across datasets and real-time applications.
Contribution
The authors propose FAAR, a novel automated artifact rejection technique that adaptively thresholds EEG data without prior knowledge, enhancing BCI reliability and reducing variability.
Findings
FAAR performs well across 13 datasets, especially in low-SNR conditions.
FAAR reduces inter-subject performance variability.
FAAR supports real-time EEG artifact rejection without manual tuning.
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI) BCIs are sensitive to EEG artifacts, yet the practical impact of automated artifact rejection on downstream MI decoding performance remains unclear. While most work focuses on decoder design, the contribution of data curation, particularly automated rejection policies, has received comparatively less attention, despite its importance for robust ML pipelines. Here, we propose Fast Automatic Artifact Rejection (FAAR), a lightweight method that computes a compact set of artifact-sensitive features, derives an epoch-level Signal Quality Index, adaptively selects rejection thresholds, and automatically rejects contaminated epochs without requiring prior knowledge of artifact types or manual threshold tuning. We evaluate FAAR on 13 publicly available MI datasets and compare it to a no-rejection baseline, AutoReject, and Isolation Forest. We show rejection effects are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
