Attacks and Mitigations for Distributed Governance of Agentic AI under Byzantine Adversaries
Matthew D. Laws, Alina Oprea, Cristina Nita-Rotaru

TL;DR
This paper analyzes attacks on distributed agentic AI governance systems vulnerable to malicious providers and proposes multiple architectures, including Byzantine-resilient, monitoring, auditing, and hybrid solutions, to enhance security with different performance trade-offs.
Contribution
It introduces new architectures for securing agentic AI governance against Byzantine and insider threats, balancing security and performance.
Findings
SAGA-BFT offers strongest security but high performance cost.
SAGA-MON and SAGA-AUD provide lightweight security with minimal overhead.
SAGA-HYB balances security and performance through hybrid architecture.
Abstract
Agentic AI governance is a critical component of agentic AI infrastructure ensuring that agents follow their owner's communication and interaction policies, and providing protection against attacks from malicious agents. The state-of-the-art solution, SAGA, assumes a logically centralized point of trust, the Provider, which serves as a repository for user and agent information and actively enforces policies. While SAGA provides protection against malicious agents, it remains vulnerable to a malicious Provider that deviates from the protocol, undermining the security of the identity and access control infrastructure. Deployment on both private and public clouds, each susceptible to insider threats, further increases the risk of Provider compromise. In this work, we analyze the attacks that can be mounted from a compromised Provider, taking into account the different system components…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
