Control of Fully Actuated Aerial Vehicles: A Comparison of Model-based and Sensor-based Dynamic Inversion
Ali Sidar Yilmaz, Buday Turan, Lukas Pries, Markus Ryll

TL;DR
This paper experimentally compares model-based geometric NDI and sensor-based INDI controllers on a fully actuated hexarotor, highlighting their respective advantages and limitations in various disturbance and parameter mismatch scenarios.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental validation of a full pose tracking INDI controller with decoupled dynamics for fully actuated UAVs, comparing it to geometric NDI.
Findings
INDI outperforms in parameter mismatch and disturbance rejection
INDI maintains lower position errors at higher control frequencies
Geometric NDI excels in attitude tracking at lower control frequencies
Abstract
Fully actuated multirotor platforms decouple translational force generation from vehicle attitude, enabling independent control of position and orientation and shifting performance limitations from attitude authority to actuator dynamics and control effectiveness. This paper compares a model-based nonlinear dynamic inversion controller (geometric NDI) with a sensor-based incremental dynamic inversion controller (INDI) on a fixed-tilt fully actuated hexarotor. Both controllers share an identical outer-loop structure and are both executed at 500 Hz; therefore, performance differences can be attributed primarily to the inversion strategy. Controller performance is evaluated in five experiments covering attitude step tracking under nominal conditions and under a 50% mismatch in the rotor force coefficient, hover disturbance rejection under an external lateral load, waypoint tracking in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
