Enabling Deterministic Passive Quantum State Transfer with Giant Atoms
Oliver Diekmann, Enrico Di Benedetto, Nicolas Jungwirth, Daniele De Bernardis, Zeyu Kuang, Francesco Ciccarello, Stefan Rotter, Peter Rabl, Alejandro Gonz\'alez-Tudela, Carlos Gonzalez-Ballestero

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates how giant atoms coupled to 1D waveguides can enable passive, deterministic quantum state transfer with high fidelity, robustness, and no need for time-dependent control, advancing scalable quantum networks.
Contribution
It provides analytical conditions and optimization strategies for high-fidelity quantum state transfer using giant atoms, including in realistic finite-coupling configurations and dispersive environments.
Findings
Achieved up to 87% transfer fidelity with two coupling points.
Exceeded 99% fidelity with ten or more coupling points.
Showed robustness against disorder and dispersion effects.
Abstract
Achieving quantum state transfer in passive ways can become a powerful asset for scalable quantum networks. Here, we demonstrate how giant atoms coupled to 1D waveguides provide a platform for such a passive, deterministic transfer. Engineering the position and strength of coupling points, we show that the nonlocal interaction can be utilized for the emission of time-reversal-symmetric single-photon wavepackets by spontaneous decay. We first derive general analytical conditions under which arbitrary qubit decays can be mapped to wavevector-dependent couplings that guarantee perfect state transfer in the continuum limit of infinitely many coupling points. Then, for experimentally relevant configurations with a finite number of coupling points, we demonstrate that high transfer fidelities can still be achieved by optimization, reaching 87% with only two coupling points and exceeding 99%…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
