When Brains Disagree: Biological Ambiguity Underlies the Challenge of Amyloid PET Synthesis from Structural MRI
Louise E.G. Baron, Ross Callaghan, David M. Cash, Philip S. Weston, Hojjat Azadbakht, Hui Zhang

TL;DR
This study investigates the intrinsic biological ambiguity in MRI-to-amyloid PET synthesis for Alzheimer's, demonstrating that ambiguity limits performance and can be mitigated by incorporating plasma biomarkers.
Contribution
It provides controlled experiments confirming that biological ambiguity constrains synthesis performance and shows that multimodal data integration improves stability and accuracy.
Findings
Performance drops when data ambiguity is introduced.
Biologically unambiguous mappings are learnable in isolation.
Adding plasma biomarkers improves synthesis stability.
Abstract
Structural MRI-to-amyloid PET synthesis has been proposed as a non-invasive alternative for amyloid assessment in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, reported performance of identical models varies widely across studies, and increasingly complex architectures have not led to consistent gains. This inconsistency is thought to be caused by a fundamental biological ambiguity: MRI captures neurodegeneration, while PET measures amyloid pathology - two processes that are often temporally decoupled in AD. As a result, similar MRI patterns may correspond to different amyloid states, creating ambiguous one-to-many mappings. MRI-to-amyloid PET synthesis may therefore be intrinsically ill-posed; however, this idea has yet to be tested scientifically. The aim of this work is to test this hypothesis through two controlled experiments. We first control the training distribution by stratifying paired…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
