GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, and the KAGRA Collaboration: A. G. Abac, I. Abouelfettouh, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, A. Adam, C. Adamcewicz, S. Adhicary, D. Adhikari, N. Adhikari, R. X. Adhikari, V. K. Adkins, S. Afroz, A. Agapito, D. Agarwal

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the first astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors using loud binary black hole signals, enhancing the accuracy of source parameter estimation and tests of general relativity.
Contribution
It introduces a method to calibrate gravitational-wave detectors directly from astrophysical signals, providing a new tool to improve calibration accuracy beyond in-situ measurements.
Findings
Verified Hanford calibration through astrophysical inference for GW240925.
Highlighted the importance of astrophysical calibration when in-situ calibration is uncertain.
Showed that high SNR detections can improve source localization and fundamental tests.
Abstract
GW240925 and GW250207 are two loud gravitational-wave signals from binary black hole coalescences observed with network signal-to-noise ratios and , respectively, by the LIGO Hanford--LIGO Livingston--Virgo network. Gravitational-wave signals from coalescing binaries have characteristic phase and amplitude evolution predicted by general relativity. These signal waveforms, together with measured instrumental calibration uncertainties, are used to infer source parameters. However, for sufficiently loud detections it is possible to constrain the calibration of the detectors directly using the signals themselves. We present the first informative astrophysical measurements of gravitational-wave detector calibration. For GW240925, we verify the inference of Hanford calibration from the astrophysical signal through cross-checks with known calibration errors obtained from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
