Fast and Accurate Prediction of Lattice Thermal Conductivity via Machine Learning Surrogates
Zeyu Wang, Shuya Yamazaki, Martin Hoffmann Petersen, Masato Ohnishi, Tomiya Yamamoto, Wei Nong, Jianghai Wang, Ruiming Zhu, Masatoshi Hanai, Michimasa Morita, Toyotaro Suzumura, Zekun Ren, Junichiro Shiomi, Kedar Hippalgaonkar

TL;DR
This paper benchmarks 15 machine learning surrogate models for predicting lattice thermal conductivity, highlighting their strengths and limitations in interpolation and extrapolation, and emphasizing their potential for high-throughput materials screening.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of diverse ML surrogate models for ppatl prediction, including new insights into their generalization capabilities and performance in out-of-distribution scenarios.
Findings
MLIP-embedded models excel in interpolation within known data regions.
Deep neural networks like ALiEGNN perform best in out-of-distribution extrapolation.
Surrogate models significantly reduce computational costs compared to first-principles calculations.
Abstract
The appearance of generative models has opened vast chemical spaces in the design of functional materials. Although machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have substantially accelerated phonon calculations, high-fidelity prediction of lattice thermal conductivity \k{appa}lat still requires accurate treatment of anharmonic interactions, which remains a key challenge for existing potentials across novel chemical spaces. To address this challenge, we present a comprehensive benchmark of 15 surrogate models for predicting \k{appa}lat using the Phonix database, which contains 6,966 entries with anharmonic phonon properties derived from first-principles calculations. Firstly, We categorize these surrogate models into three distinct groups: Physical-informed feature descriptors combined with ML models, end-to-end deep neural networks, and pre-trained MLIP-embeddings combined with ML…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
