TL;DR
This paper introduces a new diagnostic pipeline using pretrained Sparse Autoencoders to analyze how supervised fine-tuning alters semantic features in language models, revealing task-specific and safety alignment layer effects.
Contribution
It presents a novel SAE-based method to mechanistically investigate the representational changes caused by supervised fine-tuning in language models.
Findings
SAE projections reveal significant divergence in sparse latents post-fine-tuning.
Identifies task-specific and layer-specific semantic feature alterations.
Discovers a layer-wise update profile associated with safety alignment.
Abstract
The cosine similarity between a large language model's hidden activations before and after Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) remains very high. This, at first glance, suggests that SFT leaves the model's activation geometry largely undisturbed. However, projecting both sets of activations through a Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) pretrained on the base model reveals that the underlying sparse latents diverge significantly. We introduce a novel investigative pipeline which utilizes these pretrained SAEs as a high-resolution diagnostic tool to mechanistically investigate the drivers of this representational divergence. Through our analytical pipeline, we discover task-specific and layer-specific distributions of the precise semantic features that are systematically altered during supervised fine-tuning. We additionally identify a layer-wise update profile specific to safety alignment. All code,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
