Revisiting Privacy Preservation in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Conceptual Boundaries, Risk Pathways, and a Protection-Strength Grading Framework
Lei Sun, Xiuqing Mao, Shuai Zhang, Qingyu Zeng, Min Zhao, Jiyuan Li, Wenle Dong

TL;DR
This paper reviews privacy risks in brain-computer interfaces, defines conceptual boundaries, and introduces a framework to classify and enhance privacy protection across different lifecycle stages.
Contribution
It proposes a novel three-dimensional protection-strength grading framework and discusses neuroethical risks and disentanglement of sensitive information.
Findings
Classifies BCI privacy risks beyond neural data leakage.
Introduces a protection-strength grading framework with four levels.
Highlights the importance of disentangling task-irrelevant sensitive information.
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are moving rapidly from laboratory research into clinical, edge, and real-world settings. Under ISO/IEC 8663:2025, a BCI is a direct communication link between central nervous system activity and external software or hardware systems. This link expands privacy risk beyond raw neural-signal leakage: neural data, derived representations, model assets, and decoded outputs can be re-associated with individuals across collection, transmission, storage, training, inference, and feedback, or used to infer information beyond what a task requires. Starting from the general BCI paradigm, this review deffnes privacy-protection boundaries, protection objects, and the relationship between user data privacy and model privacy within a shared risk pathway. It then proposes a three-dimensional framework - protection object, lifecycle stage, and dominant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
