
TL;DR
This paper introduces a causal framework for fairness in survival analysis, allowing for the decomposition of disparities into causal pathways and providing explanations for their evolution over time.
Contribution
It develops a non-parametric causal approach for fair survival analysis, addressing limitations of statistical fairness definitions in temporal contexts.
Findings
Decomposes survival disparities into direct, indirect, and spurious effects.
Provides a method to analyze racial disparities in ICU outcomes over time.
Abstract
In the data-driven era, large-scale datasets are routinely collected and analyzed using machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) to inform decisions in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, employment, and criminal justice, raising concerns about the fairness behavior of these systems. Existing works in fair ML cover tasks such as bias detection, fair prediction, and fair decision-making, but largely focus on static settings. At the same time, fairness in temporal contexts, particularly survival/time-to-event (TTE) analysis, remains relatively underexplored, with current approaches to fair survival analysis adopting statistical fairness definitions, which, even with unlimited data, cannot disentangle the causal mechanisms that generate disparities. To address this gap, we develop a causal framework for fairness in TTE analysis, enabling the decomposition of disparities…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
