Spurious Correlation Learning in Preference Optimization: Mechanisms, Consequences, and Mitigation via Tie Training
Christian Moya, Alex Semendinger, Guang Lin, Elliott Thornley

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how preference learning methods induce reliance on spurious correlations, leading to issues like sycophancy, and proposes tie training as a mitigation strategy validated on models including large language models.
Contribution
It provides a unified theoretical framework for understanding spurious correlation learning in preference optimization and introduces tie training to mitigate this problem.
Findings
Preference learning induces reliance on spurious features via mean bias and correlation leakage.
More data from the same distribution does not reduce spurious dependence.
Tie training reduces spurious learning without harming causal feature learning.
Abstract
Preference learning methods such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) are known to induce reliance on spurious correlations, leading to sycophancy and length bias in today's language models and potentially severe goal misgeneralization in future systems. In this work, we provide a unified theoretical analysis of this phenomenon, characterizing the mechanisms of spurious learning, its consequences on deployment, and a provable mitigation strategy. Focusing on log-linear policies, we show that standard preference-learning objectives induce reliance on spurious features at the population level through two channels: mean spurious bias and causal--spurious correlation leakage. We then show that this reliance creates an irreducible vulnerability to distribution shift: more data from the same training distribution fails to reduce the model's dependence on spurious features. To address this,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
