Is Your Driving World Model an All-Around Player?
Lingdong Kong, Ao Liang, Tianyi Yan, Hongsi Liu, Wesley Yang, Ziqi Huang, Xian Sun, Wei Yin, Jialong Zuo, Yixuan Hu, Dekai Zhu, Dongyue Lu, Youquan Liu, Guangfeng Jiang, Linfeng Li, Xiangtai Li, Long Zhuo, Lai Xing Ng, Benoit R. Cottereau, Changxin Gao, Liang Pan, Wei Tsang Ooi

TL;DR
WorldLens introduces a comprehensive benchmark, dataset, and evaluator to assess the realism of driving world models across visual, geometric, behavioral, and perceptual dimensions.
Contribution
It provides a unified framework to evaluate and compare driving world models on multiple fidelity aspects, bridging the gap between visual quality and realistic behavior.
Findings
No existing model excels across all fidelity axes.
Texture-rich models often violate geometric consistency.
Behaviorally faithful models lack visual realism.
Abstract
Today's driving world models can generate remarkably realistic dash-cam videos, yet no single model excels universally. Some generate photorealistic textures but violate basic physics; others maintain geometric consistency but fail when subjected to closed-loop planning. This disconnect exposes a critical gap: the field evaluates how real generated worlds appear, but rarely whether they behave realistically. We introduce WorldLens, a unified benchmark that measures world-model fidelity across the full spectrum, from pixel quality and 4D geometry to closed-loop driving and human perceptual alignment, through five complementary aspects and 24 standardized dimensions. Our evaluation of six representative models reveals that no existing approach dominates across all axes: texture-rich models violate geometry, geometry-aware models lack behavioral fidelity, and even the strongest performers…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
