When 'For You' Isn't For You: Measuring User Agency in TikTok's Algorithmic Feed
Levi Kaplan, Devin Patel, Nicole Gerzon, Alan Mislove, Piotr Sapiezynski

TL;DR
This paper investigates user control over TikTok's algorithmic feed, revealing that while the algorithm responds to signals, users struggle to effectively influence or stop certain content from appearing.
Contribution
The authors develop novel experimental techniques to study TikTok's FYP and analyze how explicit and implicit signals influence content personalization.
Findings
FYP algorithm responds to both explicit and implicit signals.
Users find it difficult to stop unwanted content due to interface design.
Once disinterest signals are removed, the feed often reverts to showing similar content.
Abstract
The short-form video-sharing service TikTok has become an important platform in the social media landscape, with much of its popularity owed to its algorithmically-driven "For You Page" (FYP). This feature serves as the "home screen" for the platform and provides a personalized feed of content for each user. Unlike other social media services-where new users start their journey by explicitly signaling whom they choose to friend or follow-the TikTok FYP algorithm instead begins making inferences based on implicit signals, such as how long they watch particular videos. As a result, users have less explicit control over what content they see, and concerns have been raised about the impact on users (e.g., the delivery of potentially harmful content). In this work, we investigate the extent to which users have control over the content they see on the FYP on TikTok. We first develop novel…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
