Hierarchical Causal Abduction: A Foundation Framework for Explainable Model Predictive Control
Ramesh Arvind Naagarajan, Z\"uhal Wagner, Stefan Streif

TL;DR
This paper introduces Hierarchical Causal Abduction (HCA), a framework combining physics-informed reasoning, optimization evidence, and causal discovery to generate interpretable explanations for nonlinear MPC in safety-critical systems.
Contribution
HCA is a novel framework that integrates multiple evidence sources to produce faithful, human-interpretable explanations for control actions in nonlinear MPC, outperforming existing methods.
Findings
HCA improves explanation accuracy by 53% over LIME across three applications.
Domain-specific calibration increases explanation accuracy to 0.88.
Each evidence source is essential; removing any reduces accuracy by 32-37%.
Abstract
Model Predictive Control (MPC) is widely used to operate safety-critical infrastructure by predicting future trajectories and optimizing control actions. However, nonlinear dynamics, hard safety constraints, and numerical optimization often render individual control moves opaque to human operators, undermining trust and hindering deployment. This paper presents Hierarchical Causal Abduction (HCA), which combines (i) physics-informed reasoning via domain knowledge graphs, (ii) optimization evidence from Karush--Kuhn--Tucker (KKT) multipliers, and (iii) temporal causal discovery via the PCMCI algorithm to generate faithful, human-interpretable explanations for control actions computed by nonlinear MPC. Across three diverse control applications (greenhouse climate, building HVAC, chemical process engineering) with expert validation, HCA improves explanation accuracy by 53\% over LIME…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
